![]() ![]() It is not known where the photo was taken, but it appeared in an earlier thread on April 21, 2018. One of the posts was the original photo of the Backrooms: a picture of a large carpeted, open room with yellow wallpaper and fluorescent lighting on a Dutch angle. On May 12, 2019, an anonymous user started a thread on /x/, 4chan's paranormal-themed board, asking users to "post disquieting images that just feel 'off '". Fan-made video games, collaborative fiction wikis and YouTube videos have also been created: a series of horror shorts created by YouTuber Kane Parsons in 2022 is credited with popularizing Backrooms content on the mainstream internet, and he is slated to direct a film adaptation of his Backrooms videos. One of the most well-known examples of the Internet aesthetic of liminal spaces, which depicts usually busy locations as unnaturally empty, the Backrooms was first described as a maze of empty office rooms that can only be entered by " noclipping out of reality".Īs its popularity grew, internet users expanded upon the original concept by creating different levels and entities which inhabit the Backrooms. The Backrooms are an online urban legend originating from a creepypasta posted on a 2019 4chan thread. Read more stories on Business Insider, Malaysian edition of the world’s fastest-growing business and technology news website.A typical depiction of the Backrooms, digitally rendered As an apparent move to avoid such lawsuits, in the wake of the celebrity photo hack 4chan agreed to remove content when notified of “bona fide infringement,” Ars Technica has reported. If Jennifer Lawrence (the most high-profile celebrity hacking victim) took nude photos of herself, she might be able to file a successful copyright suit against websites that posted her nude images. Indeed, Reddit has removed underage photos from the site, including pictures of the gymnast McKayla Maroney.Īnother big exception is copyright law. That exception suggests 4chan could be prosecuted for pictures of underage people included in “The Snappening,” which could technically qualify as child porn. For one thing, nothing in Section 230 protects online publishers of third-party content from criminal prosecution for the sexual exploitation of children. However, there are exceptions to Section 230′s immunity. “Although courts disagree on how to interpret it, a few have held that even deliberate decisions to republish content knowing it may violate the law enjoys immunity from liability.” “Websites enjoy wide immunity for publishing user-generated content,” law professors Danielle Citron and Neil Richards wrote in Forbes last month. The 1996 law, passed as the internet was rapidly growing, has been credited with helping social websites like Craigslist and Reddit flourish because they don’t have don’t have to worry about getting sued over content that other people post on their sites. (Hunter Moore, the man behind a notorious “revenge porn” website, has said Section 230 protected his enterprise.) Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides immunity from liability for websites that publish information that’s provided by other parties. The release comes after hackers stole celebrities’ nude photos, which were reposted on a Reddit thread called “The Fappening.” Reddit and 4chan are both providing a forum for hackers to violate the privacy of celebrities, and now, private individuals through the hack known as “the Snappening.”īut there’s a US law that may protect Reddit and 4chan from getting sued over some of these images, as Esquire has noted. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |